The BOSTON trial was a Phase 3, global, randomized, open-label study that evaluated XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone alone in patients with multiple myeloma who have received 1–3 prior therapies.
Open label
(N=402) Patients with multiple myeloma who have received 1–3 prior therapies were randomized into 2 study arms
Randomization*
XVd (n=195) Once-weekly XPOVIO® + bortezomib with twice-weekly dexamethasone
* Stratified based on prior proteasome inhibitor exposure, number of prior regimens, stage, and region.
Primary endpoint
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Key secondary endpoints†
Overall response rate (ORR)
Response rate for responses ≥ very good partial response (VGPR)
Grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy
† Non-key secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), overall response rate (ORR) for XVd crossover patients only, time to next treatment (TTNT), time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS) for XVd crossover patients only, and PFS for post-XVd/Vd/XVd crossover treatment only, safety and tolerability of treatment, and patient-reported peripheral neuropathy.
Baseline patient characteristics1,2
XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (n=195)
Bortezomib and dexamethasone alone (n=207)
66 (40–87)
67 (38–90)
Male
115 (59)
115 (56)
Female
80 (41)
92 (44)
<65
86 (44)
75 (36)
65–74
75 (38)
85 (41)
≥75
34 (17)
47 (23)
White
161 (83)
165 (80)
Black or African American
4 (2)
7 (3)
Asian
25 (13)
25 (12)
Other or missing
5 (3)
10 (5)
4 (0–23)
4 (0–22)
0–1
175 (90)
191 (92)
≥2
20 (10)
16 (8)
<30
3 (2)
10 (5)
30 to 59
53 (27)
60 (29)
≥60
139 (71)
137 (66)
I
56 (29)
52 (25)
II
117 (60)
125 (60)
III
12 (6)
16 (8)
Unknown
10 (5)
14 (7)
1
99 (51)
99 (48)
2
65 (33)
64 (31)
3
31 (16)
44 (21)
Stem Cell transplantation
76 (39)
63 (30)
Lenalidomide
77 (39)
77 (37)
Pomalidomide
11 (6)
7 (3)
Bortezomib
134 (69)
145 (70)
Carfilzomib
20 (10)
21 (10)
Daratumumab
11 (6)
6 (3)
97 (50)
95 (46)
del (17p)/p53
21 (11)
16 (8)
t (14;16)
7 (4)
11 (5)
t (4;14)
22 (11)
28 (14)
1q21
80 (41)
71 (34)
‡ Includes any of del (17p)/p53, t (14;16), t (4;14), 1q21.
The BOSTON Trial
The BOSTON Trial
Once-per-week selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus twice-per-week bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
Median PFS for XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone was 13.93 months (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53–0.93; p=0.0075) vs. 9.46 months for bortezomib and dexamethasone alone.
Consistent with the overall population, XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone significantly reduced the risk of progression or death vs. bortezomib and dexamethasone alone in select subgroups, including patients with an age ≥65 years, high-risk cytogenetics (including any of del (17p)/p53, t (14;16), t (4;14), 1q21), and one prior line of therapy.
The prespecified subgroup analysis of patients who had previous proteasome inhibitor therapy was trending towards significance.
Limitations of subgroup analysis:
These subgroup analyses were exploratory in nature, were not included in the study objectives, and did not control for type 1 error.
These prespecified subgroup analyses were neither powered to assess PFS nor adjusted for multiplicity.
OS was not reached in patients receiving XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.57–1.23; p=0.1852) vs. 25 months in patients receiving bortezomib and dexamethasone alone (median follow-up: 17.3 months vs. 17.5 months, respectively)
XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone
vs
1.4
months
Bortezomib and dexamethasone alone
Durable response with XPOVIO®
Median DOR
20.3
months
XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone
vs
12.9
months
Bortezomib and dexamethasone alone
Safety profile
The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events in >10% of patients1,2
XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (n=195)
Bortezomib and dexamethasone alone (n=204)
All Grades n (%)
Grade ≥ 3 n (%)
All Grades n (%)
Grade ≥ 3 n (%)
Thrombocytopenia
117 (60)
77 (39)
55 (27)
35 (17)
Anemia¶
71 (36)
31 (16)
47 (23)
21 (10)
Neutropenia
29 (15)
17 (9)
12 (6)
7 (3.4)
Cataract
42 (22)
17 (9)
13 (6)
3 (1.5)
Vision Blurred§
25 (13)
1 (0.5)
13 (6)
0
Nausea
98 (50)
15 (8)
20 (10)
0
Diarrhea
63 (32)
12 (6)
51 (25)
1 (0.5)
Vomiting
40 (21)
8 (4.1)
9 (4.4)
0
Constipation
33 (17)
0
35 (17)
3 (1.5)
Fatigue
82 (42)
26 (13)
37 (18)
2 (1.0)
Asthenia
48 (25)
16 (8)
27 (13)
9 (4.4)
Pyrexia
30 (15)
3 (1.5)
22 (11)
2 (1.0)
Edema peripheral
23 (12)
1 (0.5)
26 (13)
0
Upper respiratory tract infection§
57 (29)
7 (3.6)
44 (22)
3 (1.5)
Pneumonia§**
35 (18)
27 (14)
34 (17)
24 (12)
Bronchitis††
24 (12)
4 (2.1)
20 (10)
1 (0.5)
Weight decreased
51 (26)
4 (2.1)
25 (12)
2 (1.0)
Decreased appetite
69 (35)
7 (3.6)
11 (5)
0
Hypokalemia
19 (10)
8 (4.1)
10 (5)
5 (2.5)
Neuropathy peripheral§
63 (32)
9 (5)
96 (47)
18 (9)
Dizziness
24 (12)
1 (0.5)
8 (3.9)
0
Headache
19 (10)
1 (0.5)
11 (5)
0
Taste disorder§
19 (10)
0
4 (2)
0
Insomnia
31 (16)
2 (1.0)
32 (16)
4 (2)
Cough
35 (18)
1 (0.5)
30 (15)
0
Dyspnea§
26 (13)
1 (0.5)
35 (17)
5 (2.5)
§ Includes multiple preferred terms:
Vision blurred includes blurred vision, visual acuity reduced and visual impairment.
Upper respiratory tract infection includes upper respiratory infection, nasopharyngitis, pharyngitis, respiratory syncytial virus infection, respiratory tract infection, rhinitis, and viral upper respiratory infection.
Pneumonia includes pneumonia, pneumonia pneumococcal, hemophilus infection, pneumonia bacterial, pneumonia fungal, pneumonia influenza, pneumonia parainfluenzae viral, pneumonia respiratory syncytial viral, and pulmonary sepsis.
Neuropathy peripheral represents high level term peripheral neuropathies NEC.
Taste disorder includes taste disorder, ageusia, and dysgeusia.
Dyspnea includes dyspnea and dyspnea exertional.
¶ Grade 5 anemia was reported in one patient (0.5%) in the Vd arm.
** Grade 5 pneumonia was reported in 3 patients (1.5%) in the XVd arm and 3 patients (1.5%) in the Vd arm. These events were considered to be not related to study treatment.
†† Includes one (0.5%) Grade 5 event in the XVd arm considered not related to study treatment.
Treatment-related nausea with XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone was generally transient and manageable1,3
Percentage of patients experiencing nausea events per month in patients receiving XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in the BOSTON trial3
Percentage of patients experiencing nausea decreased in the first month of receiving XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone using appropriate antiemetic measures.3
Patients receiving XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone experienced lower levels of grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy1
21%
Grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy
XPOVIO® in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone
CI, confidence interval; CR, Complete Response; DOR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; sCR, Stringent Complete Response; TTNT, time to next treatment; TTR, time to response; VGPR, Very Good Partial Response.
References 1. FORUS Therapeutics Inc. XPOVIO® (selinexor tablets) Product Monograph. March 22, 2024. 2. Grosicki S, et al. Once-per-week selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus twice-per-week bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma (BOSTON): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10262):1563-1573. 3. Data on File. Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. 2021.